Fast Food Whos to Blame On-Demand Essay

You get out have 45 minutes to plan and spell out an prove on the consequence assigned below. Before you begin writing, fill the portrayal circumspectly and plan what you volition say. Your taste should be as well-organized and c befully written as you empennage guess it. As Ameri bungholes add on pounds, critics atomic number 18 increasingly blaming the quick- regimen industry. Teenagers have filed lawsuits blaming McDonalds for their wellness problems, and a public health group in California has asked the governor to decl ar sisterhood fleshiness a state of emergency. But p atomic number 18ntsnot the unwavering regimen companies, not the organizationare in the best po depend uponion to fight the epiphytotic of over slant children. Parents are trustworthy for instructing sun-loving alimentation and praxis habits. Parents are to bill if they permit their kids feed un fit regimens and sit in front of the television or computer for hours at a clip. We hav e laws against parents leaving a irritated weapon where children can find and lend starself it to hurt themselves or others.Its time to get parents to nonplus the resembling right to protect their children from unhealthy provenders and drop of exercise. Adapted from Daniel WeintraubsThe Battle Against steady nourishment Begins in the HomeThe Sacramento Bee, declination 17, 2002 Explain Weintraubs argument and discuss the extent to which you accord or disaccord with his analysis. Support your position, providing reasons and examples from your avow experience, observations, or interpreting. The sample scholar experiments that follow m apply the EPT pull ahead Guides criteria. type savant essay with a take a shit of 6 Daniel Weintraub, in The Battle Against Fast Food Begins in the Home, states that parents are responsible for the increasing epidemic of child obesity. Parents request to be responsible overflowing to teach their children healthy consume exercis e habits. In our world to twenty-four hour period, children sit rough play video games exclusively day, if they are allowed to. Weintraub argues that parents carry to look up to the plate and get children involved in some fount of exercise. I agree that parents adopt to take more responsibility for child obesity, precisely schools, dissolute food companies the government also need to take that same initiative. Parents have a lot of influence on their children from the day that child is born.Children hear how to talk from their parents, how to respect their elders and they should learn healthy alimentation exercising habits from their parents. There are many steps to take in showing a child what is healthy unhealthy. A parent could play sure that a child receives a serving of fruits or veget fits at lunch dinner, kill soda from the house and even eliminate all junk food from the house. From a young age, my parents taught me to have an apple for a snack instead of a ta ke inie that I should be getting 5 servings of fruits or vegetables a day. This lesson has influenced me even until today when my friends I go away go and eat a salad at lunch instead of pizza or chips. I have also eliminated all soda from my diet. Parents need to show their children that exercise is not a bad thing. At a young age, parents need to show children that there are other things to do, same playing tag or playing at the park, than incisively honoring t.v. Parents could introduce their children to different sports until the child finds one that he or she is interested in.My parents entered me in dance class were lucky in finding that that was what I enjoyed. I have been dancing since I was three years grey-haired I also played soccer for 8 years. It isnt very unwieldy to turn off a t.v. and send your children outside to play. Parents are not restorely responsible for child obesity schools, turbulent food companies the government also need to take action against child obesity. Schools today do not forget a great selection of healthy food. My student body is luck that we have an off-campus lunch merely even indeed it is difficult to find healthy food. Fast food companies definitely need some diabolic. With denote that appeals to children, it is no wonder that America is fat. Through whining for that rook that a child can get with a kids meal, the parent is pressured to go to a debauched food place. Daniel Weintraub argues that parents are responsible for child obesity. I agree with Weintraub tho schools fast food companies also need to attention in the fight against child obesity. input This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a sum up of 6. The superior response prognosticates that the generator is very well-prepared to insure college-level reading and writing. The writer cl untimely apologises Weintraubs argument regarding childhood obesity in the first off paragraph and takes a thoughtful position, conten ding that Weintraub is right to a degree but that schools, fast food companies the government also need to take that same initiative. The writer skillfully restates Weintraubs argument in the first paragraph and take ins a further connection in the second paragraph by saying, they should learn healthy eating exercising habits from their parents. However, the emphasized should suggests that the writer questions whether this al right smarts happens. The cobblers last again refers back to Weintraub. The essay demonstrates quality and clarity of thought with its careful analysis of both the strengths and falteringnesses of Weintraubs somewhat overstated position. The essay reflects an effective use of issuance statements and strong personal examples to both sponsor Weintraubs argument that parents are responsible for childhood obesity with respect to eating and exercise habits and make the case that others are responsible as well.Sentence structure is alter and word pickax i s precise. The essay has few errors. Sample student essay with a score of 5 America is now haven as the fattest country in America. Many of our countrys pile blame the fast food industry for over-advertising, selling unhealthy food, and selling oversized portions. However, others feel that Americas obeisity is a matter of personal responsibility. In his expression The battle against fast food begins in the home, Daniel Weintraub explains that parents need to take responsibility for the eating habits of their kids, and I agree with his opinion in this matter. As Americans, we are given the freedom of choice, however, to begin with we become adults, it is our parents that have to teach us how to make the right decisions. This is Weintraubs point. If parents are not willing to teach their kids the dangers of eating too much fast food and not getting enough exercise, then those kids have no way of life to make the right choices. Kids learn best at an early age, therefore, teaching them good habits will allow them to make the correct decisions later. I agree with Weintraubs opinion that parents are responsible. Obviously, fast food companies are expiration away to market towards kids they are more impressionable.Because of this, if parents would start teaching kids early on, they could use that impressionable quality to their advantage. The benefits of information are apparent in closely everything we do. For example, a better educated person can solve problems promptly and easily. The same goes for someone educated in terms of health habits. They can make the best choices because they have been taught to do so. Fast food companies provide a service. It is up to us, or our parents if we are not yet of age, to finalise how much of that service we should use. In finding, Daniel Weintraub is correct in his assesment of one of the causes of Americas obeisity. The lawfulness is that no child can grow up to be an keen human beingness without a proper learn ing, wether it be in math or eating habits. Fast food companies are al shipway going to compete for customers and try to make property, but they cannot realise our decisions. The besides people that can make choices for us our ourselves, and we cannot make the right choices without proper education from our parents. We cannot blame others for our own problems.Only when parents and the population of American in public are educated and choose to live healthy lifestyles will the countrys obeisity cease. comment This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 5. The clear competence of the essay indicates that this writer is quite spry to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer addresses the topic of childhood obesity clearly, summarizing and then agreeing with Weintraubs position. Further references to Weintraub in the body and conclusion maintain a clear focus on the argument. The essay presents a well-reasoned response, indicating that va rious factors contribute to childhood obesity but finally widening with Weintraub in placing the responsibility on parents We cannot make the right choices without proper education from our parents. The essay shows some depth of thought in reservation the case that adults are responsible for devising their own sound choices while parents are responsible for the choices their children make. However, the writer simply dismisses the responsibility of the fast-food industry without analysis.The essay is fair clearly organized around the thinkers that parents are responsible for their childrens choices and that the best way to counter fast-food advertising is through education however, some repetition and a lack of strong examples weaken the writers argument. The sentences are varied and word choices are generally precise and effective. The essay has only(prenominal) a few tike errors failure to use a semicolon with however, misspelling of obesity, and the distracting repetition of America in the first line. Sample student essay with a score of 4 Obesity Can Be Stopped Within the Home The article titled, The battle against fast food begins in the home, is the authors Daniel Weintraub, point of view on the rising obesity problem in America. Mr. Weintraub wrote this particular piece with one intention to educate the readers with his own views. Mr. Weintraub doesnt blame the Government, or advertising for Americans weight problem.But, instead he feels that parents are the sole component. He not only blames parents for their childrens poor eating habits, but also for they lack of exercise, and physical activity. I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today and parents deficient to blame everyone and thing but themselves. I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today. Mr. Weintraub makes the point in his article that, Fast Food is fast., and It can also seem in expensive. (Weintraub) This is just what parents who work all day want. They want to feed their children, not cook but feed, and relax after a hard geezerhood work. They may not mean to, but they are already to blame for their childs eating habits. However, taking the easy route, they have already put their children at risk. The dynamics of their daily regimne naturally allow them to feed their child junk. Not only do I believe that Mr. Weintraub is correct because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today, but I also strongly Agree with Mr. Weintraub because of parents wanting to blame everyone and thing but themselves.First off, in an article written by Shannon Brownlee titled, Its Portion twisting that makes America fat, a mother who was suing McDonalds stated, 1 everlastingly believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. (Brownlee) This statement shows a parent who is willing to blame a company, whose sole think is making money, for her childs obesity. All the wh ile parents eat, themselves, the exact same food as their child. They dont hold any responsibility that maybe their child will mimic these same habits. In the Letters to the Editor section a woman, Patricia Gonzalez, poses a good question Why arent they (parents) home cooking them (children) healthy food (Letters to Editor) Instead of parents complaining about how companies frenziede their kids fat, or how advertising hooked their kids, why dont they eliminate these factors and cook their children a meal they go to sleep is healthy I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today and parents wanting to blame everyone and thing but themselves. Mr. Weintraub expressed the right point.As Americans, we need to take responsibility ourselves and not just blame other people. Parents could eliminate obesity before it became a problem in their childs life. That is why I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub. Commentary This essay illustrates the EP T Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 4. This adequate response to the topic suggests that the writer should be able to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer clearly addresses Weintraubs argument that parents are responsible for the epidemic of childhood obesity but fails to explain why the fast-food companies, whose sole purpose is making money, do not share responsibility. The writer generally understands the handing over and develops a sensible, if somewhat simplistic, response why dont they . . . cook their children a meal they know is healthy The essay has a clear organization around the issues of parents lack of timedynamics and regimne of parents livesand parents desire to shift blame to others. However, well-chosen examples would strengthen the support for this argument. The essay demonstrates adequate use of syntax and language however, word choice is sometimes imprecise. For example, The article . . . is the point of view . . . and hold any responsib ility. kinetics and regimne are used both imprecisely and repetitively. The writer has general control of grammar and usage however, errors in punctuation and capitalization are frequent and distracting. Sample student essay with a score of 3 Who is to blame the parents, fast food companies, the government or yourself People now a days are so quick to sue fast food companies for making them fat but its all about self control. One should know his or her own body and watch what they eat. Fast food places are on almost every corner but doesnt mean their making you eat there. In New York a teenager is sueing McDonalds for making her fat. He weighs in at 400 pounds. His mother says I always believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. How is this executable Two patty cheeseburgers, deep fried potatoes, and a turgid cup of soda is clearly not healthy.This kid probably ate at McDonalds majority of the time but I mistrust he ate there everyday for every meal so how is McDonalds fully to blaim. Whatever happen to exercising, if this teenager was getting the required exercise there is no way he could way in at 400 pounds. Dont get me wrong Im not just on the fast food companies side. Yes McDonalds super-sizing most of their meals is a little extreme. Having good deals like dollar sign nugget Tuesdays is also a big temptation. Fast food companies could cut stack on the location of there restuarants. Being that its so convinent that its close to your house, cheap and fast is another way that makes Americans so addicted. In conclusion, Both Americans and Fast Food Companies can change for the better. Americans start taking some responsibility for what you put into your own body. Fast Food Companies think of how many lives are at risk because of what your feeding them and cut back on expanding your franchises.Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 3. Although the essay indicates a maturation competence on the part of the w riter, it is flawed in significant ways that suggest the writer needs additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. The writer does not fetch at a thesis until the conclusion, which states, In conclusion, Both Americans and Fast Food Companies can change for the better. Even if this thesis had been presented in the introduction, however, it would need to be made more specific. The writer does not summarize or explain Weintraubs argument and fails to respond to the argument that parents are primarily responsible for their childrens eating and exercise habits. The writer does not use Weintraubs argument about the lineament of parents to develop the response as a result, the essay is not pore on Weintraubs argument but instead focuses entirely on the responsibility of the individual and the fast-food industry.The essay demonstrates simplistic thinking. It ignores the socioeconomic and developmental issues that can pack children and paren ts from making wise decisions about what they eat. It also ignores the imperative for businesses to make money when it suggests that McDonalds could cut down on the location of there restaurants. A superfluous organization is present, with the two body paragraphs each addressing a single idea that is summarized in the conclusion. The paragraphs are underdeveloped they need additional specifics and analysis. In addition, the federal agency of parental responsibility needs to be explored. The paragraphs need effective topic sentences relating back to a controlling idea or thesis. The writers language is super informal, relying on a series of rhetorical questions and colloquial comments (Who is to blame . . . How is this possible Whatever happen to exercising Dont get me wrong.) in place of analysis. The writer uses vague or incorrect pronoun reference (one should know . . . and watch what they eat but doesnt mean their making you eat there), and sentence structure is weak (Being th at its so convinent . . . is another way that makes Americans so addicted.).The main errors, however, are in the mechanics, with numerous errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. Sample student essay with a score of 2 Bigger isnt always better Last year a Bronx teenager who weighted in at a wooping 400 pounds sit in a confrence room while their mother tryed to file a suit againt McDonalds for make her kid fat. When ask why she replyed I always believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. More and more americans are trying to blame fast food for the reason they are fat, but is it what they eat or how much. Shannon Brownlee asked this question and this is what she found. Portion sizes has been creeping up ward science 1972. That when McDolands introduced its large size fries. (which now was smaller than a medium today.) And now they make more money then ever, they do it by consumer manipulation. Example 7-Eleven can sell the 64-ounce Double Gulp for only 37 cents mo re the 16-ounce 89 cent regular Gulp. Youd feel ripped off if you bought the smaller size. And thats just the way I feel when I go to fast food why not get the bigger size your pay just as much as a regular.After reading Shannon Brownlees article I understand and agree that people arnt getting fat from the food but from how much they eat. So maybe all those moms should stop getting mad that their kid are getting fat and be mad at their kid for eating so much and throwing away money on food that 70 of the time they dont finish Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 2. The near flaws here indicate that this writer will need considerable additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. The writer does not summarize or respond to Weintraubs argument, instead lifting portions from another article by Shannon Brownlee about fast food. The writer does not use the passing at all. Sample student essay with a scor e of 1 Many people blame the fast food industry for making them obese. But its not their deformity it is the fault of the parents. It is theirs for not teaching the person how to eat right.It is the parents responsibility to teach their children o eat right and to excise at lest once a day. Americans have taken the blame of obesity and put it one that fast food industry. Many parents have filled lawsuits against McDonalds for their health problems. Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 1. The fundamental deficiencies of this essay clearly indicate that the writer needs much additional practice to be ready to succeed at college-level reading and writing. The essays lengthsix sentencesis insufficient to respond to the question. The writer misunderstands the passage and fails to refer to it. The essay is repetitive. The first and fifth sentences repeat each other, as do the second, third, and fourth sentences. The writer culls the idea of par ental responsibility from the passage but offers no support, reasons, or examples as the prompt instructs.The essay appears to be incomplete. It ends with a (misstated) statement of fact from the passage that either belongs in the synopsis portion of the essay or should be omitted in lieu of the writers own opinions and supportthe better option. The writer lacks basic control of syntax and vocabulary. The writer has serious and persistent errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that severely interfere with meaning. Pronoun confusion (It is theirs . . . ), preposition contumely (blame of obesity), and punctuation errors are profound.